The first bi-monthly Monetary Policy Review for 2014-15
is scheduled for April 1, 2014, with horses taking to courses for
general elections. As the election code of conduct will dampen active
government policy measures, at least for the next eight weeks there will
be a disproportionate burden on the monetary policy. A viewpoint is it
would be prudent to postpone the monetary policy till the elections are
over or till the Union Budget for 2014-15 is presented by the new
government in June 2014.
For the past 50 years,
monetary policy has never been inhibited by impending general elections.
As such, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) should conduct its monetary
policy unfettered by any thought about the polls.
Macroeconomic backdrop
The
Interim Budget is postulated on an increase in nominal GDP of 13.4 per
cent in 2014-15, which would point to an 8 per cent inflation rate and a
5.5 per cent real growth. It does point to fiscal stress.
There
are many uncertainties on the current macroeconomic front. First, the
El Nino effect can adversely affect the ensuing monsoon which would, in
turn, impinge on agricultural output. Secondly, it is uncertain as to
how strongly investment would revive in 2014-15. Thirdly, raising of
administered prices cannot be deferred.
Finally,
there can be wild swings in the perceptions of Foreign Institutional
Investors (FIIs), which could reflect in sudden large capital inflows or
outflows.
The year-on-year Consumer Price Index
(CPI) for February 2014 shows a lower rate of 8.1 per cent, while the
Wholesale Price Index (WPI) shows a year-on-year increase of 4.7 per
cent, which could be considered moderate. Recently, however, the RBI has
rightly been stressing the CPI as the more appropriate indicator of
retail inflation.
With international uncertainties
and the need to raise administered prices, there is no assurance that
the battle with inflation is anywhere close to being won.
External sector
The
latest data point to a balance of payments current account deficit
(CAD) for 2013-14 of around $40 billion (2.3 per cent of GDP).
While
the CAD in 2013-14 is much lower than the previous year, the recent
decline in exports is of concern as the CAD could once again widen as
with an uptick in activity, imports could surge.
With
the volatility of FII flows, there could be very large and
destabilising outflows. The control of ‘volatility’ of the exchange rate
has been the bedrock of the RBI’s policy, but ‘volatility’ is perceived
differently at different points of time. In the foreseeable future, the
RBI would need to spell out its philosophy of exchange rate management
as mere control of ‘volatility’ does not set out a clear objective.
The
appropriateness of an exchange rate has to be viewed in relation to the
inflation rate differential between India and major industrial
countries, which would point to the need for depreciation over time.
In
the more immediate two months, however, the delicate political economy
situation would warrant that the RBI ensures that the nominal
dollar-rupee exchange rate remains within a range of, say, $1= Rs.
61-63.
If, as in the recent period, there are sudden
large capital inflows, the RBI should undertake active forex purchases,
which would obviate any large nominal appreciation of the rupee.
Equally,
the RBI should stand ready to counter any excessive depreciation
triggered by large outflows. This approach needs to be followed only for
the next two months as market expectations can run wild and destabilise
the external sector. Such an approach cannot, however, be viable in the
long term.
The slowdown in the year-on-year CPI inflation could generate a clamour for reducing policy interest rates.
The
present policy repo rate of 8 per cent is low, given the current
inflation rate. At present, there are too many windows for RBI
accommodation, with the overnight repo, the 14 day, 28 day, and 21 day
term-repos, the Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) and the Stand-by
Liquidity Facility.
The recent 21 day term-repo
auction for Rs. 50,000 crore (which was at a weighted average rate of
8.79 per cent and a cut-off of 8.69 per cent) not only helps banks tide
over the March 15 advance tax payment, but aids and abets the March
31window dressing by banks. The RBI should never be a party, directly or
indirectly, to window dressing of banks’ balance sheets.
As
already recommended by official groups and committees, the 14-day
term-repo, as part of the April 1, 2014 monetary policy, should be made
the key policy interest rate.
The MSF, which stands
at 9 per cent now, should become the overnight repo facility at bank
rate. Other term-repo facilities should be discontinued. The RBI would
do well to work towards a system where the key repo policy rate is
somewhere between the one-year deposit rate and the base lending rate.
New framework
Governor
Raghuram Rajan has already mentioned the need to develop a consensus
between government and the RBI on the new policy framework. This can be
worked out by a fusion of the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms
Commission Report and the Urjit Patel report.
While
this issue has to be debated at length, Rajan would do well to give it a
focused direction by articulating, in the April 1 monetary policy, the
broad thrust of how such a consensus could be developed.
(The writer is a Mumbai-based economist)
No comments:
Post a Comment