Eight suggestions to reform the current rail structure in tune with the needs of the 21st century
Indian Railways is more than 150
years old and has played a vital role in the socio-economic development
of the country. Today, the Railways is one of the largest rail networks
in the world, transporting around 23 million passengers every day and
employing 1.4 million people.
The Railway Board
single-handedly manages the railway network consisting of 17 zones and
68 divisions. Since Independence, the growth of the railway system has
been hindered by the Board’s muddled performance.
This
has contributed to a continuous decline in the Railways’ market share
in the transport sector. The National Transport Development Policy
Committee Report 2014 shows that over the past five decades, 61 per cent
of passenger transport and 59 per cent of freight transport has shifted
from rail to road. The annual Railway Budget focuses on improving
services. However, out of the 674 projects worth ₹1.6 lakh crore
sanctioned in the past 30 years, only 317 were completed. The deficit
required to complete the remaining projects is estimated to be over ₹1.8
lakh crore.
The rail ministry is ignoring the
fundamental change required to transform Indian railways to suit 21st
century demands. The way forward is to dismantle the archaic
organisational structure set up during the 19th century and establish a
more efficient mechanism to operate these 17 zones. Now, with another
Railway Budget round the corner, the key question is, will the doer in
Suresh Prabhu deliver to expectations? Here are eight suggestions
focusing on reforming the current structure to suit the needs of the
21st century:
Decentralisation of power
The
Railway Board will function only as the policy and regulatory body. The
chairman will be an expert with a team focusing on each core-business
activities.
The Board could hand over the management
of non-core business activities such as catering and ticketing or
managing of railway research institutes and so on to private players on
PPP mode.
Empowering zonal railways
Each zonal
railway will be the final decision maker on operation, management and
development of its own zone, without consultation with the Board. For
instance, each zonal head can decide about constructing stations and
platforms, adding or removing trains, upgrading rolling stock,
regulations for safety, cleanliness and hygiene. Each zone should work
within the framework of policies set by the Board.
A
company could be set up to run each zone. The Konkan Railway
Corporation, which operates and manages the Konkan railway zone, is a
model company.
Development under PPP
Each zonal
company gets into PPP for renovating its stations similar to the
development of airports in metros. The presence of a private entity
would attract FDI easily.
Monetisation of property
Indian
Railways is the owner of a large amount of land across India whose
valuation is very high owing to the prime location of the station in a
city or town.
At present, railway properties are
underutilised. Each zonal company brings in expertise for optimisation
of land and air space for commercial purposes such as shopping malls and
business centres. This will not only generate more employment
opportunities but also generate additional revenue to compensate railway
employees adequately and provide subsidised travel fares as required.
Independent zonal budget
Each zonal company would prepare an annual budget to govern its zone and divisions.
This
would enable individualistic growth of each zone based on its
requirement. The annual financial budget directly provides the budget
outlay for each zonal railway.
Fixing of travel fare
In
consultation with the zones, the Board will set the upper limit of
fares and charges for passenger and freight travel based on distance
travelled which will be subject to periodic revisions. The existing
framework of the fare revision committee will be strengthened.
Co-ordination between two zones and profitability
To
lay new railway routes, the zonal companies concerned will work
together. For instance, to run a bullet train between two zones, the
zonal companies could enter into a JV to construct the infrastructure
and invest in modern locomotives. The expenses would be shared
proportionately by each zone.
Similarly, each zonal
company would be accountable for their own transport output and
profitability. The income generated for a rail journey gets divided
among the zones proportionately.
For instance, if the journey covers three zones, then each zone earns income for tickets booked from its zone.
Performance review
The
Board reviews zonal companies’ performances annually and provides
feedback for improvements. Periodic review and modification of policies
required to facilitate further development of railway.
For
instance, faster connectivity with high speed trains would reduce the
travel time between two locations. This would call for re-evaluation of
current demarcation of 17 zones to reduce it to fewer numbers for easier
operation.
The Expert Group Report 2012 brought to
light the downtrend of the Railways due to its diminishing efficiency
and eroding share in national transport and predicted it may possibly
end up as a burden on the national economy instead of being its bulwark
and vital support.
These suggestions are indicative
of the railway reforms to revamp and modernise Indian Railways into a
world class mode of transportation to cater to the needs of the 21st
century and to support the inclusive growth of the nation.
One
would wish for a reform-oriented Railway Budget instead of
announcements of new lines and introduction of new trains based on
political compulsions.
(The writer works with the Centre for Public Policy Research.)
No comments:
Post a Comment