Charan Singh,Padmakumar Nair and Shamil M
The Government has set up the Expenditure Management
Commission to rationalise subsidies, among other expenditure items in
India. India incurs nearly one per cent of food subsidy annually,
generally utilised under the existing public distribution system (PDS)
consisting of Food Corporation of India (FCI) and nearly five lakh Fair
Price Shops (FPSs). The public distribution system has been the object
of criticism for inefficiency; it is vulnerable to misappropriation,
resulting in large-scale losses to the Government. According to some
estimates, nearly 40 per cent of foodgrains are lost annually under the
PDS.
The price differential that exists between the
market price and the subsidised prices of PDS items is believed to be
the main reason why this arbitrage opportunity is exploited. The last
mile delivery mechanism, involving the owner of the fair price shop, is
most vulnerable to the price differential.
Diverting stocks
Various
schemes experimented with in different States such as strengthening of
monitoring systems initiated by village-level vigilance committees,
GPS/GPRS-based tracking of PDS vehicles, use of IT-based centralised
solutions to match and monitor the delivery process and make the
existing system more efficient, neglect the inherent inefficiencies
present in the PDS system due to the price differential.
In
all these instances, fair price shopowners have an incentive to divert
the PDS grains to the open market, either by misrepresenting the quota
available to the end consumers or by offering small cash incentives to
the end consumer for forgoing foodgrain requirements.
A
major feature of the PDS is the general lack of accountability down the
entire supply chain, leaving the leakages that occur at different
points completely unaccounted for. Typically, in the case of the
distribution network of any fast moving consumer goods of any private
sector company, precise accountability is defined at every stage, where
the loss or diversion of any product is directly attributed to the
immediate possessor.
The supply chain
While it
is hard to propose a precisely similar system for PDS, largely because
of government ownership and the distribution mechanism, it may be
possible to draw some parallels between these two systems to gain some
meaningful insights.
The use of technology can help
plug the leak in the supply chain of the public distribution system and
ensure that at each stage in the PDS supply chain, full market price is
paid to the immediately previous stage on acquiring foodgrains. This
practice imposes on the supervisors of any stage, ownership and
accountability to store and transfer the foodgrains to the next stage.
At
the godowns of the FCI, which are government-owned and operated
entities, the supervisor's salary incentives would be tied to the losses
incurred at the respective godowns. At the fair price shop, which is
the end consumer interface, this system tries to tackle the issue of
price differential by selling the foodgrains to the end consumers at the
subsidised prices; the Government/FCI credits the price differential
into the fair price shopowners’ bank accounts once the food is delivered
to the target population. This system tries to incorporate the benefits
of cash transfer except that fair price shopowners are required to have
bank accounts; it avoids the need for bank accounts for every end
consumer.
Bringing in bio-metric smart cards on the
demand side can help track the foodgrains to be distributed right up to
the end consumer. The Aadhar card can be meaningfully used for
validating the identity of the consumer.
Managing transportation
While
this system clearly defines accountability, transportation management
and reconciliation of the payment system can become challenging. To
address this issue, efficient implementation of a centralised IT
infrastructure (CITF) can be useful.
The centralised
system can make use of tracking devices such as the Radio Frequency
Identification Number (RFID) on each sack of foodgrain which records the
time of delivery/acceptance and the number of sacks delivered at every
PDS point, resulting in efficient inventory management. While a GPS
system, being experimented with in some States, simply tracks the
vehicle, the centralised system goes all the way up to the sack level to
ensure delivery.
This type of dynamic tracking
helps link inventory management with the payment system so that all such
information is stored and accessible at a centralised location. The
RFID-CITF system could help prevent possible malpractices such as
diversion of the foodgrain while wrongly registering the acceptance of
foodgrain by just delivering the RFID tag (and not the actual goods).
In
other words, the responsibility of ensuring the receipt of goods in
right quantities can be fully attributed to the receiving warehouse or
fair price shop through the payment mechanism discussed above.
RFID-based tracking ensures time and quantity information, which could
help in quantity reconciliation at fair price shop level.
The
scheme discussed in this article faces challenges with respect to last
mile connectivity in remote villages, in terms of power availability,
connectivity and so on. A phased introduction of this scheme starting
from already IT-enabled fair price shops down to those in remote
villages will surely help in effectively plugging leakages in the public
distribution system.
(Singh is RBI Chair Professor of economics at IIM-Bangalore. Nair and Shamil are students)
No comments:
Post a Comment